Grammar Q & A Newsgroup

Click on Questions and Answers to see the newest messages. If you want to post a message or comment, you will be prompted to login. (If you are not registered, you can do so from the login box.) Remember to bookmark this page to make it easier to return to it.

    Grammar Exchange    Grammar Exchange  Hop To Forum Categories  The Grammar Exchange  Hop To Forums  Questions and Answers    3-to-2 set
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posts: 3035
Posted   Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
1)A 6-foot-2-inch tennis player named John won a 3-to-2 set.

2)He was John Smith, 6 feet 2 inches, who defeated Doe in a 3-to-2 set.

Did I use '3-to-2' correctly?

Thank you
Member
Posts: 11697
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Yes, Welkins, you did a good job! Smile

One thing: It was John Smith, 6 feet 2 inches tall, who defeated ...

This is a pattern we normally use: It was X who ...

Richard
Member
Posts: 8500
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I am playing tennis for many years and I do not recognize your expression:

> won a 3-to-2 set.

Show me the link on the net which you used as a MODEL.

Do you mean:

- he won a set by (the score of) 3 to 2? (that would be a short set, as one normally plays until a player gets 6 games)

- he won a 5-setter, or a 3 out of 5 sets match, by (the score of) 3 to 2 (in sets)?
Member
Posts: 11697
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
That's interesting that you've been playing tennis for many years, Jerry. It's a great sport!

I'm not a tennis player, so I bow to the master. It's interesting that I interpreted what Welkins wrote to mean the set consisted of five games and the subject of the sentence had won three out of the five games.

Richard
Member
Posts: 8500
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
OK, I looked again at it:

> won a 3-to-2 set.

I think it can work, in a simplified way.
Member
Posts: 3035
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Thank you very much, Richard and JerryS,

quote:
Show me the link on the net which you used as a MODEL.


Now I understand what you mean. I can tell that your English is better than mine,which I cannot fathom, so I think that MODEL may be really work for you. But to me, I've not readied yet; however, I'll keep what you mean MODEL in mind.

I can tell you that, since a couple of days ago, when I have been reading the paper , I have been trying very hard to understand the structure of the grammar; therfore, one day when I make up a sentence, I hope that I can follow that kind of of MODEL in it. So far, it does not really work for me. I hope it will someday.
Member
Posts: 8500
Posted   Hide PostEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I think you're putting way too much stress on the grammar.

You should LISTEN to the idiomatic usage and memorize patterns used in MODELS.

What I mean by model is simply GOOD ENGLISH spoken and written by educated natives. I mean read or listen to the BBC, the New York Times, choose a sentence there and make sentences based on that MODEL.

You seem to just try to learn grammar and words and compose sentences based on that, but you forget about the idiomatic usage, and that's the most important part: the acceptable patterns of the language, the MUSIC of the language.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Marius Hancu,
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

    Grammar Exchange    Grammar Exchange  Hop To Forum Categories  The Grammar Exchange  Hop To Forums  Questions and Answers    3-to-2 set