Click on Questions
and Answers to see the newest messages. If you want
to post a message or comment, you will be
prompted to login. (If you are not registered, you can do so
from the login box.) Remember to bookmark this page to make
it easier to return to it.
This is an example of proper style, with commas: --- A farewell to justice: Jim Garrison, JFK's assassination, and the case that ... - Page 3 by Joan Mellen - History - 2005 - 547 pages
Stern and square-jawed, six feet three inches tall, Jane demanded of the teacher, "Where's my Earling?"
As I've told you, IMO sequences of multiple adjectives, separated with commas from the noun, are just better accepted by the reader than the lone adjective.
You won't find too many, if any, examples with "Tall, Jane" in published books: http://books.google.com/books?...22&btnG=Search+Books especially without logical connectedness, but if you find one, pls tell me and show me the complete link.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: Marius Hancu,
1. Being tall, Jane managed to reach the top shelf.
The lone adjective, separated with commas, survives better this way, IMO.
----- A marriage settlement: Modeste Mignon and other stories by Honoré de Balzac, George Saintsbury - 1901 - 778 pages Page 19
Being tall, she could at will assume the port and dignity of a queen. Men were ensnared by her conversation, as birds are by bird-lime, for she had ----
Thanks a lot Jerry. I really appreciate your going into all this trouble.
And as usual, thank you Rachel.
How about:
1 - Tall, she lost all this advantage by/with the ugliness of her face.
2 - Tall, she also was beautiful to boot.
3-She, being tall, could at will assume the port and dignity of a queen.
I have only replaced Jane with 'she' in three of your sentences. Do they still sound natural? I think they sound better with the noun, but I can't tell whether they are acceptable or not with a pronoun instead of the noun.
This message has been edited. Last edited by: navi,