1) We have a man injured.

2) We have an injured man.

What is the difference in the meanings?


3) There was a man injured, lying on the balcony.

4) There was an injured man, lying on the balcony.

What is the difference in the meanings?






Original Post

Hello, Navi,

More than difference in meaning, I'd speak about difference in usage.

I find (1) and (2) to be similar in meaning, but I'd use (1) within a context of a list of damages:

1') We have a (more probably one) man injured, two women dead, and three children in shock.

There is a slight difference in emphasis: in a man injured the emphasis falls on injured, while in an injured man we are speaking about a man (emphasis on that noun) who happens to be injured (secondary information).

As regards (3) and (4), I think (4) is more likely to occur, for the reasons mentioned above and also because I don't like the proximity of the two participles, the past participle injured and the present participle lying, in (3). I think we could, or even should eliminate the comma in (4).

Merry Christmas!

Add Reply

Likes (0)