Skip to main content

I'm curious about the grammatical construction of this sentence:  I am glad you are here.  It appears to contain 2 independent clauses, which doesn't seem right (no conjunction) .  Possibly "that" is understood which would make the second clause dependent, but again, that really doesn't seem right either.  I've tried diagramming it, but I can't make it work properly.  I guess I'm just missing something.  I'm betting someone here can explain this sentence's construction.  Thanks for your help.

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hello, Jump4Fun, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange.

@Jump4Fun posted:

I'm curious about the grammatical construction of this sentence:  I am glad you are here.  It appears to contain 2 independent clauses, which doesn't seem right (no conjunction) .  Possibly "that" is understood which would make the second clause dependent, but again, that really doesn't seem right either.

The conjunction "that" is omitted, so you do have a main clause, I am glad, and a subordinate one, you are here. "That" introduces an adverbial clause of reason.

I've been thinking that the "that"-clause can also be said to complementize the adjective "happy." The verb is "am." "Am glad" is the main verb phrase.

Complements can express the reason for the emotion or feeling denoted by the adjective, after adjectives like glad, happy, sorry, pleased, afraid, or function as a content clause after adjectives of cognition, such as sure, certain, doubtful, aware, convinced.

Last edited by Gustavo, Co-Moderator

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×