Skip to main content

Hi,

It would be greatly appreciated if you could assist with my questions in bold below.

Example:

In support of your contention that you acquired the units in the ABC unit trust, you provided the following documents:

  1. a)       a XYZ bank history report which shows that, on 1 January 2000, you withdrew $100K to acquire the units in the said trust. You need to use “that” as it follows by a date. [Can I remove the relative clause “which”?]
  2. b)      a XYZ bank history report which shows you withdrew $100K on 1 January 2020 to acquire the units in the said trust [can remove which, another [Can I remove the relative clause “which”?)
  3. c)       a XYZ bank history report showing you withdrew $100Kon 1 January 2020 to acquire the units in the said trust. [Can I use "shows/showed" instead of showing?]
Last edited by Tony C
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@Tony C posted:

Can someone shed some lights on the above?

The answer to all three questions is "no." The clause introducing the list ("you provided the following documents") indicates that all the items in the list will be a noun phrase (NP): "You provided NP1, NP2, NP3, etc."

Examples (1) and (2) are noun phrases. If you delete "which" in (1) and (2), you will change them into sentences. But sentences cannot function as the complements of "provided" in that sense. Therefore you can't delete "which."

The difference between (3), on the one hand, and (1) and (2), on the other, is that (3) contains a reduced relative clause. Changing "showing" to "shows" will change the noun phrase into a sentence, and (3) will likewise be wrong.

Last edited by David, Moderator

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×