S + (has or have) + been + past participle
Why after āhas beenā the sentence does not follow with aāpast participleā instead of an āadjectiveā?
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:S + (has or have) + been + past participle
quote:The problem is that there has been inadequate research and theory development to support the fast growing practice of scenario planning.
quote:(1) Does it mean "been" is playing two roles; one is "been" and one is "past participle" ?
quote:(2) Could you tell me what is the transitive verbs for the above sentence?
Hi, Joshua and Ahmed āquote:The problem is that there has been inadequate research and theory development to support the fast growing practice of scenario planning.
That paraphrase doesn't work for me, Ahmed. I understand the main point of the sentence to be that research and theory development have not supported the fast-growing practice of scenario planning; that is the reason the author has described the research and theory development as being inadequate.quote:Iāll paraphrase your sentence like this:
Inadequate research and theory development have supported the fast growing practice of scenario planning.
Good day, Sir @David, Moderator!
Could you please help me with this sentence:
When I met Liza yesterday, it was the first time I (have seen, had seen, have been seen) her since Christmas.
Thank you in advance.š
@James101 posted:Good day, Sir @David, Moderator!
Could you please help me with this sentence:
When I met Liza yesterday, it was the first time I (have seen, had seen, have been seen) her since Christmas.
Thank you in advance.š
Hello, James101, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange.
It would have been much, much better to start a new discussion thread with your question rather than to ask it inside a ten-year-old thread that doesn't relate very closely to your question.
Nevertheless, to answer your question, "had seen" is the only correct answer in the set. The present perfect doesn't work, given that the "when" clause is in the past tense, and the passive is ungrammatical because of the direct object.
Hello again, Sir @David, Moderator!
Thank you for the warm welcome, Sir. I would like to apologize for posting my concern in the wrong thread. I'll take note of this, Sir. Regardless, thank you so much for a more comprehensive explanation.
Looking forward for more informative conversations with you. God blessš