Skip to main content

Hello Grammar Exchange members!

I've run into the following sentence while reading an article on the Internet.

a. On the contrary, inefficient management of ESG erodes a company’s brand value and ends up bleeding the business needn't be reiterated through mere words.(https://brandequity.economicti...interlinked/87516495)

I don't understand how this part "needn't be reiterated through mere words" can be attached to the sentence.

As far as I understand, there're two complete sentences in a.

b. Inefficient management of ESG erodes a company’s brand value.

c. Inefficient management of ESG ends up bleeding business.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance.


Original Post

Add Reply

Link copied to your clipboard.