Skip to main content

"That" can also be used as a substitute with a noncount noun, where "the one" could not be used:

The victim's own blood was of a different blood group from that [ = the blood] found on the floor. (CGEL by Quirk et al)AC38D9C9-EF8A-4CFE-80A8-6CE3C267CAAA

Is there any reason why the author used with instead of for, because I always read "substitute for" something?

Attachments

Images (1)
  • .
Last edited by Robby zhu
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@Robby zhu posted:

"That" can also be used as a substitute with a noncount noun, where "the one" could not be used: . . .

Is there any reason why the author used with instead of for, because I always read "substitute for" something?

Hello, Robby zhu—"With" is not collocating with "substitute" in the sentence in question. The "with"-phrase modifies "used," just as the "as"-phrase does. The modifying prepositional-phrase adjuncts can be used in either order:

It can be used as a substitute with a noncount noun.
It can be used with a noncount noun as a substitute.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×