Supposedly someone says thank you to you because you have helped them cleaning the back yard. Do you say, not a problem or no problem? What is the difference?Read More...
Yes, Tony, "help" is a special verb—a very special verb, like "let." We use "help" in the complementation pattern [help] + [direct object] + [base form of a verb]. Optionally, the base form after the direct object can be a "to"-infinitival: "You have helped them (to) clean the backyard." Normally, it's just the base form. To illustrate, here's a famous line of Tom Cruise, in the movie Jerry Maguire .Read More...
Example: Tim's my sister's husband. Does the abbreviation mean Tim's - Tim is or Tim's for posessive? I know you can write Tim is my sister's husband. Just wondering about the above if it is correct in any way. I am confused. Thanks!Read More...
Hello, Frapmochas, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange. I agree. Interestingly, in other contexts, "Tim's" can also be a contraction of "Tim has": "Tim's broken his ankle"; "Tim's been asleep now for a while." That said, the contraction of perfective "has," at least after a proper name, is more common in speech than in writing. It's normal, however, for "it's" to signal a contraction of "it has" as well as "it is," even in writing. It's been a while since this has come up on G.E.Read More...
Hi all, any help on the below would be appreciated. How should the following be sentenced correctly? The bloke who nobody likes The bloke that nobody likes The bloke who no one likes The bloke that no one likes The bloke no one likes Thanks SamRead More...
Hello, SamGrammarCheck, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange. Please have a look at our Guidelines page. "Grammar check" is a bad title here. What do you mean by "sentenced"? Judges sentence convicts. Since none of your examples is a sentence, I sentence them all to death. For your information, all of your examples are noun phrases, not sentences. Both "no one" and "nobody" are OK. You can use "who(m)," "that," or nothing. If you want to create a sentence, add a predicate, such as "is here,"...Read More...
Hello, everyone! • It cost 70% less to construct than a normal building . Which view is grammatically correct to evaluate the role of above to infinitive – to construct – between following two ; 1. it ; preparatory ‘it’, to construct ; extra subject. In this case, the original sentence of above before abbreviation is ‘ It cost 70% less to construct than (it cost to construct) a normal building .'? 2. it ; empty ‘it’, to construct ; adverbial to modify the verb ‘cost’. Since I feel this...Read More...
While I discussed above issue with a local person later, he advised me as follows about his analysis. How much reasonable do you think his opinion is?; 1. the original sentence is ‘ It cost 70% less to construct it than a normal building, as recycled material was used .’. - first ‘ it ’; preparatory it - ‘ to construct it ’; extraposed subject phrase 2. by the rule of ‘tough-Movement’(object raising) the ‘ it ’ after ‘ construct ’ has been raised to the beginning. 3. then, we have ‘ It cost...Read More...
Hello, everyone! I've seen following paragraph; "But instead of simply looking at whether people grew up in hot or cold climates, the researchers took a more nuanced approach, looking at whether people grew up in milder climates, where temperatures are closer to about 71 degrees Fahrenheit (22 degrees Celsius), or if they lived in places with more extreme temperatures.“ * source; Could Climate Change Affect People’s Personalities? Since I know the conjunction whether should be used after a...Read More...
Hi, Kis—Neither one is a sentence I would use. I might say: (c) The books for which refunds need to be issued are on the table. (d) The books that refunds need to be issued for are on the table.Read More...
I can't figure out whether to say 'bush' or 'bushes.' Doesn't a bush consist of many small plants with many branches and leaves? How do I know when to say 'bush' and when to say 'bushes?'Read More...
Hi, Ashraful—We use "bush" when there appears to be only one plant or one entity-like conglomeration of plants involved; otherwise we use "bushes."Read More...
Hi Although I don't want to take your precious time, if you are okay, I would like politely to ask you to check if my reasoning is right. • Through this forum, I learned when I am trying to say something under first type conditional, I can't use "would" in a main clause. https://www.usingenglish.com/f...lt-WOULD-gt-phone-me . • Also this is not even understood as a mixed conditional although there are <If clause-first type conditional> and <main clause-second type conditional> .Read More...
Hi, TaeBbongE, Here, we have one main clause (counterfactual): 'she would phone me.' That main clause is directly related to two subordinate clauses. The first subordinate clause is in the present simple 'factual' and that creates 'a real-hypothetical' relationship, which isn't accepted by many people. That's why I see that aa-1 doesn't work. BTW, Late Marilyn and Rachel did accept this kind of mixed conditional. See here: https://thegrammarexchange.inf...-of-would#1881008601 And here:...Read More...
Firstly: Am I correct to say after the reporting verbs and after the word "that", it can be followed by any tense? e.g. On 1 January 2021, you stated that It is your understanding that the company's director has not changed since its establishment. or On 1 January 2021, you stated that It was your understanding that the company's director had not changed since its establishment. Secondly, if the above 2 sentences are grammatically correct, any difference in terms of its meaning? Thirdly: Can...Read More...
Hello Gustavo, my apologies. What I meant was for indirect speech, when should we change the tense from present to past tense after the conversation took place. e.g. Gustavo told me that I have worked so hard - How long do I have to wait from the time I had a conversation with Gustavo which requires me to change to past tense as follows: Gustavo told me that I had worked so hard. Thanks!!!Read More...
Hi. - Vaults full of research attest to how emerging-market optimism is more soundly based than rich-country pessimism. (The Economist) I view the first four words as an NP, with research being the head, "vaults full of" being something like a quantifier, because it is research that attest , not vaults . But why doesn't attest agree with research by using third person singular? What do I miss? Regards, Robby zhu.Read More...
Intransitive verbs: In grammar, an intransitive verb does not allow a direct object. Example: The fees of $10K was used to pay my son's school fee ; when converting this to an intransitive verb, using the verb "totals/totalling", it will become: The fees totalling to $10K was used to pay my son's school fee. I understand totalling is an intransitive verb and I think $10K acts as an object there, if so, isnt that it contradicts with the grammar rules, that is intransitive verb cannot be...Read More...
No, Tony. "$10K" is not a direct object. Not everything that comes after a verb is an object, for example: - You are Tony. ("Tony" is not an object, but a subject complement.) I will not refer to the verb "total," because I've already had my say on it here . There are more more usual verbs than "total," like amount to and add up to, which also link the subject with the corresponding value, not with an object.Read More...
1) Is it grammatically correct to use "to you" in the sentence below. e.g. Further to my email to you dated 1 January 2021 regarding the termination of your lease. Below is a tenant moving out checklis t to ensure a smooth process of moving. 2) Also, is it correct to say a tenant moving out checklist?Read More...
Hello, everyone!! As far as I understand, in informal style we often use ‘where’ to introduce defining relative clauses instead of ‘at/on/in which’ only. However, I’m a little confused to have found following two contradictory answers about the usage; “to which vs. where”. 1. “ The shop where he went ” is OK, or you can retain the unnecessary preposition and leave off the relative pronoun: “ the shop he went to ”. But “ the shop where he went to ” is too much. – American English, retired...Read More...
In court, the better the evidence the more weight it is given. What does it actually refer to? Does it refer to nothing?, is that what you called it in the other thread as a "matrix clause" It does not tell you who gives the weight and to whom the weight is givenRead More...
I got you, it is a degree of comparison, it's like The more money you have, the greater amount of food you will consume. Whereas matrix clause, it does not compare anything.Read More...
Hello, everyone! For one difficult sentence in following paragraph I’m wondering about its sentence structure; “ Compounding the difficulty, now more than ever, is what ergonomists call information overload ” How do you analysize the normal sentence of above before inversion or clefting, while I am assuming it as follows?; 1. before reversed pseudo clefting with ‘what’; “Ergonomists call compounding the difficulty information overload.” (S+V+O+C, ‘compounding’ as a gerund), or 2. before...Read More...
a. I am worried about this patient getting cured. Is that sentence grammatically correct and meaningful? I think one would have to say b. I am worried about this patient not getting cured. But maybe (a) could be used with the same meaning. I don't think it could, but I heard someone say something like that and I began wondering. Maybe it was just a mistake. Many thanksRead More...
Hi, Azz—Sentence (a) would only be correct and meaningful in a context in which the speaker regarded the patient's getting cured as highly undesirable.Read More...
I have come across this sentence in an outside book They asked me........ I wanted coffee or tea. (if_whether_whether not_that) I do know "whether" is OK. Yet, what about"if"?Read More...
I agree that "have" can be changed/backshifted to "had"; however, "have" works, too, assuming the speaker of the sentence " He called me up and said that they have all the rooms booked" believes all the rooms to still be booked. I do not view this as a passive causative. If it were a passive causative, a "by"-phrase could suitably be used at the end: "He called me up and said that they have/had all the rooms booked by their front-desk clerks ." But that does not strike me as the intended...Read More...
I found this today skimming through the news. "The pair of center backs helps replace the departures of both Alex De John and Kamal Miller and shore up part of the back line." https://www.themaneland.com/20...6/lion-links-1-22-21 It seems to me that "helps" and "shore" aren't in agreement in this sentence and should be, however, I can't figure out how to correct it--whether it should be "helps" and "shores," or else "help" and "shore". After googling, (unless I'm mistaken) it appears that...Read More...
Hello, I just wanted to confirm my understanding of the proper noun and common noun are correct based on my examples below. I have contacted Tony's mother [Tony's mother is a proper noun so you can't say the Tony's mother], I have contacted the Nurse's mother [The Nurse's mother is a common noun, so you can use "the" before the noun]. I went to t he Fiji Mountain in Japan before Covid hit us. I believe the Fiji mountain is a proper noun, comparable to Tony's mother but why it sounds okay to...Read More...
I agree with Gustavo that the name needs to be Mount Fuji ( Mt. Fuji ) in English, not the Fuji Mountain . The only mountain name that I can think of which follows the pattern "the ____ Mountain" is The Magic Mountain, but that is the title of a book, translated from German ( Der Zauberberg ), and "Magic" is not part of the real name of the mountain that goes by that epithet, even in the book.Read More...
Hi Because of heavy snow, my car should have got stuck in the snow. In the above sentence, should have P.P has the following usage? Oxford: should definition https://www.oxfordlearnersdict...lish/should?q=should Practical English USE 2 Past: ~~~.Read More...
@ahmed_btm Ah ha, I see! Depending on the thing that the subject is animate or inanimate, "should have Past Participle" construction has two meanings or not. However as for my case, it is only used in one way - that is, expressing possibilities. Thanks~!!!!!!Read More...
(1)I think there's a huge difference between him and me. Why we always put the 'me' after 'him'?Can we change the order? Can we use 'myself' in stead of 'me'? While in another case : (2)He was worried that the connection between himself and Voldemort had been damaged. Why here 'himself ' is put ahead of 'Voldermort'?Read More...
Hi, Winter, It is just a matter of style, not grammar. Many people would see that 1 sounds more polite. I wouldn't use 'myself' in your example above.Read More...
Hi, Tony C, 'In my mind' could mean 'in my opinion' or something that exists in my imagination like the common expression 'in one's mind's eye'. Also, you can use it when you are thinking about something or somebody without feeling worried about it/them. Another expression is 'keep in mind' which means 'remember'. 'On my mind' means to be constantly in one's thoughts; of concern to one. It refers to something worrying or distracting you. A similar expression is 'to weigh on one's mind'. -...Read More...
1) You are required to take care of my cat after I go out of town tomorrow. 2) You' ll be required to take care of my cat after I go out of town tomorrow. 3) He was advised that he was required to sometimes work long hours. 4) He was advised that he would be required to sometimes work long hours. Q1) Are they all correct? If so, what is the difference between 1) and 2) or 3) and 4)?Read More...
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .