Hi, I wonder in the following sentences what the antecedent is and if the blanked reference is correct. I assume that it should be they , these , or those because it refer to some pepole exophoricallym, not the question itselft. I wonder whether it is right or not. "Who do you think posts such blames on the Internet ? ( That) 's the people who don't use their real names".Read More...
Hi, Jiho—What are you quoting? Cite your sources. In the first sentence, "such blames" doesn't work, since "blame" is an uncountable noun. In the second sentence, "That's" should be "It's." The second sentence is intended as a truncated cleft sentence: " It's the people who don't use their real names [who post such blames on the Internet] ."Read More...
I graduated recently from Typhoid University, majoring in Gender Studies with a specialization in the 1950s and minoring in Mechanical Engineering. Correct? I have gotten a suggestion to potentially change this to "a minor in Mechanical Engineering", making it "I graduated recently from Typhoid University, majoring in Gender Studies with a specialization in the 1950s and a minor in Mechanical Engineering." Are both okay? Or would one be better than the other? I honestly thought that the...Read More...
While reading a dialogue, I came across this sentence: Student 2: OK,but what activities could we do at the youth club? Playing games and drawing isn't very interesting for older kids. My question is: Why ( is ) not ( are )? Is (playing games and drawing) considered one activity?Read More...
Hi, Ahmed towab—By using the singular ("is"), the speaker is representing playing games and drawing as if he conceived of them as one activity. I conceive of them as two separate activities and would therefore have used the plural.Read More...
Which are correct: 1-He was killed to keep him quiet. 2-He was killed to be kept quiet. 3-He was killed to keep quiet. (meaning: He was killed so that he would keep quiet. 4-He was killed in order to keep him quiet. 5-He was killed in order to be kept quiet. 6) He was kidnapped to toil in a mine as a slave. 7) He was kidnapped to exploit in a mine as a slave. 8) He was kidnapped to be exploited in a mine as a slave. Gratefully, NaviRead More...
Hi, Navi, Grammatically speaking, I think only (2) works, because it's the only one where the subject is shared by both verbs. I think the active voice would sound better: 2a. They killed him to keep him quiet. I think only (6) and (8) work for the same reason I mentioned above.Read More...
I told some people that A - H got shots today, I and above will be scheduled later. Their reply: A - H is above I. I see the alphabet as incrementing up from A, not as listed downward on a page, i.e. Aaron, Bob, Cathy... Yolanda, Zach. Yoli is after or "above" Cat. I guess I should have use after.Read More...
Hi, Jim, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange. Yes, I would use "after," too. I think of the alphabet as a horizontal string of letters that is organized sequentially from left to right, even though it is possible to imagine it in other ways. Letters that are farther to the right from other letters come after them.Read More...
a. It was a small store with not a lot of choices. b. I went there with not a lot of money. c. With not a lot of time left, I decided to run. Are the above sentences grammatically correct? I heard a non-native speaker say something like (a) and it sounded a bit strange to me. I started having doubts. They seem fine to me, but in (b) and (c) I'd use 'without a lot' instead of 'with not a lot'. Many thanks.Read More...
Hi, Azz—I like our new member Jack's suggestions. (Welcome to the Grammar Exchange, Jack.) Another thing you could do, as you know, to rescue the sentences from unnaturalness is to use "without" instead of "with not": a1. It was a small store without many choices. b1. I went there without much money. c1. Without much time left, I decided to run.Read More...
Which of the following verb forms are correct? The following are short notices. Can I use the following tenses interchangeably in an exam. 1 - This is to inform all the students that our school has organized/is organising/will organise/is going to organise a dance programme from 15 February, 2021 to 18 February 2021. 2- This is to inform all the students that our school is going to celebrate/will celebrate/is celebrating Mahatma Gandhi's birthday at the school ground on 2nd october this year.Read More...
Hi, Subhajit—What is it that you would like your sentence to say? You would use "has organized" if the organizing had already taken place, "is organizing" if the organizing were presently taking place, and "will"/"is going to organize" if the organizing had not yet taken place.Read More...
Hi there, Recently I stumbled upon a great discussion of the right usage of possessive 's . The thing is, we know 's is needed. However, the name mentioned in the subject line is Thomas ' there: https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/02/05/thomas-book-could-be-banned-minister-to-get-report/ So, is this a mistake or not?Read More...
Hi, Jack, Under 5.114 The 'zero genitive' on pages 320/321 of A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language by Quirk et al , we can read: Therefore, the correct genitive of Thomas /tom∂s/ is Thomas's /tom∂siz/.Read More...
Hello, Lizzi, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange. Please visit our Guidelines page, to which there is a link in the toolbar at the top. "help me pls" is not a suitable title, and you should provide one or more examples to help us understand your question.Read More...
Hello, I do not understand if the word "political" can be applied to informal groups, like a group of friends, or if it only applies to formal organizations like governments and companies. Does anyone know? Thanks!Read More...
Sorry, I will do my best to describe what I mean and show examples but it's hard to describe what I am trying to say. I am trying to find out if the term political can be applied to social groups that aren't formal organizations, like governments, to describe power struggles between group members. Here is one example: The political war between the group of cast aways on the show, Survivor, caused Earl to be voted off the island. (When I say political I don't mean voting for a specific...Read More...
Do all the following three sentences mean the same? Where should I put the preposition phrase. 1- In India , people love to eat mangoes. 2- People in India love to eat mangoes. 3- People love to eat mangoes in India. 4 - Farmers are protesting in India. 5 - Farmers in India are protesting. 6 - In India , farmers are protesting.Read More...
Hello, Subhajit—I see that you are shopping around for answers. Your alter ego has already asked about both sets of sentences elsewhere. In both (1) through (3) and (4) through (6), all three sentences CAN be used to mean the same thing; it does not matter in which of the three positions you place the PP "in India." Syntactically, the PP can attach (deep-structurally) in different places in (1), (3), (4), and (6); and this CAN make a different to meaning IF you want to use the sentences so...Read More...
Hello, I found the following sentence in a TIME article on Thursday, January 27, 2020. (1)What’s needed: more clerks to enter all of that data. I understand that "data" is a plural form of "datum". I searched sample sentences in COCA and found the following examples. (2) I would hope that all key datum (account numbers, receipts, etc) are encrypted with some large randomly generated (3) a datum about some physical state that is presented to a user by a meter or similar My questions: 1) Is...Read More...
Hello, BOBO, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange. Please visit our Guidelines page to learn how to ask a question properly here. There are no errors in "He likes sharing snacks with classmates during recess."Read More...
Hello, I hope you can help me please. Even after looking at the dictionary, I am confused about the use of the phrasal verb let up. I understand its meaning. However, when ,if ever, does the plural form (let up) get used (apart from after a modal verb)? Also, is there a past tense form of this phrasal verb? (letted out doesn't sound right to me). Thank you as always.Read More...
Hi, Mrchuffie, The past tense of "let" is "let." However, your question is not clear. Could you provide an example for us to understand your doubt?Read More...
Hello, everyone, hope you are doing right! I have a question regarding the word "but" in one of my texts. My teacher just checked it, and she told me I must write a comma before "but". However, I don't quite understand the reason, so I hope you can answer these questions. Is she right? If the answer is yes, may you tell me why? If she's wrong, could you tell me why? I'm asking this based on the theory that says we have to put a comma before "but" ONLY when there are two independent clauses...Read More...
Hello, Joseosorio, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange. I agree with you that the comma before "but" above is not required, but only optional.Read More...
Hi, Emad Ragheb, "Downtown" can be an adverb: - I work downtown . or an adjective: - I work in downtown Buenos Aires. The only preposition among the ones above that can precede an adverb is "near." Just as we can say: - My office is near here . ("here" is an adverb) we can say: - My office is near downtown.Read More...
Is the following phrasal verb correct in this context? - Do you want to come out on Friday night? or this one: - Do you want to come over on Friday night? Thank you.Read More...
"Do you want to come out on Friday night?" can be used either in reference to the interlocutor's coming out of whatever building in which he is located or in reference to his admitting to others that he is homosexual (viz., the idiom "coming out"). "Do you want to come over on Friday night?" would be used in reference to the interlocutor's coming over to wherever the speaker is located.Read More...
When we were in school, we were taught that we should use present perfect tense when we want to mean continuation of an activity that started in the past and still continues, and it may even continue into the future as in this example. ' He has devoted himself without taking holidays for thirty years .' My question is, can I use past tense here? He devoted himself for thirty years. Is this sentence really grammatically wrong? If it's not, is there any difference in meaning between the two?Read More...
Hello, Ahmed Imam Attia—Both choices are possible, but only "don't have to" is likely to be used. It means that, because of the holiday, they are not obligated to go to school. With "mustn't," the sentence would only be used by someone who was afraid that students might go to school despite the fact that it is closed.Read More...
Hello, I sometimes wonder how I should choose demonstratives. The following example comes from an argumentative essay from my student. He is talking about physical punishment. The student used "these" in the blank. However, I wonder what all possible types of demonstratives. How can we define the antecedent in this example? Is it the whole multiple sentences before "these" or "punishment for their comfort, more fast and strong effect for children's control" "But in some cases, physical...Read More...
Hello, Jiho—"These" does not work in the blank. Your student could say: "And these facts create an unfair situation." "That" would also work; however, the reference would be to "children's resistance is limited" (i.e., to the fact that children's resistance is limited), and I suspect that your student, who has made other grammatical errors in the passage, intends to say something else.Read More...
1. The country’s Supreme Court ruled last year that the ban was illegal, and gave the Knesset, or parliament, until March 1st to amend the law to allow gay couples to commission surrogacies domestically. ( The Economist.) 2. British courts have given the government until the end of July to come up with a new plan to cut air pollution. ( The Economist). I encountered the first sentence and then found another one. It seems to me that the writer is treating PP "until March 1st" as an NP, the...Read More...
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .