Skip to main content

July 2021

Is this sentence correct grammatically?

Probably one of the most beautiful beaches I’ve ever been.Read More...
Hi, Margarita, and welcome to the G.E, This is not a sentence. The main clause lacks the subject and the verb, and the subordinate clause lacks the preposition 'to' at the end. You can say: - Hurghada is one of the most beautiful beaches (that) I have ever been to . OR: - It is probably one of the most beautiful beaches (that) I've ever been to .Read More...
Last Reply By ahmed_btm · First Unread Post

BEING

Dear Sir "Then, you get a feel that this is going to be a nice character if you perform and shoot it well. Sometimes, you can hear good stories and if it is not done well, people won’t watch. So, for each film, you have a pace, shooting pattern and being careful with the camera and everything." Why " being " used here before "careful"? Why can't we make sentence like the below without " being " So, for each film, you have a pace, shooting pattern and careful with the camera and everything."...Read More...
Thank you SirRead More...
Last Reply By Former Member · First Unread Post

which VS what

Could you tell me the difference in meaning between each of the two sentences? 1)I looked at the menu. There was only one item. There was nothing to choose. 2) I looked at the menu. There was only one item. There was nothing to choose from . 1) There were not many shoes left to choose from. 2) There were not many shoes left to choose. Does the second sentence sound wrong? 1)I don't know what to eat for dinner. 2) I don't know which to eat for dinner.Read More...
Re: which VS whatRead More...
Last Reply By Yoda · First Unread Post

Basic question

This is a basic thing, I think, but, could you tell me whether these sentences are grammatically correct or not? If they are correct, is it O.K to omit, the,? He is the person that I gave the box. This is the box that I gave him.Read More...
Indirect objects without prepositions come between the verb and the direct object: - I gave him the box ⇒ This is the book I gave him . (Notice that the focus on "the box" in the sentence with the relative does not alter the sequence Subject + Verb + Indirect Object of the sentence without the relative.) If introduced by "to," the indirect object will be emphatic and will appear after the direct one: - I gave the box to him ⇒ He is the man I gave the box to . (Here, the focus on "the man" in...Read More...
Last Reply By Gustavo, Co-Moderator · First Unread Post

I hardly think she knew them.

Hi! Could I ask you a question about the adverb "hardly"? I was wondering whether (1a) below is grammatically correct and (more or less) the same meaning as (1b). (1) a. I hardly think she knew them. b. I think she hardly knew them. I got this question when I was thinking about the pair like (2) below: (2) a. I don't think she knew them. b. I think she didn't know them. In (2a), the negative word "not" is raised from the subordinate clause to the main clause, and I guess (2a) is the...Read More...
Thank you so much, David! So, maybe only "not" can be raised to the main clause, but not any other (semi-) negative words. Interesting!Read More...
Last Reply By yasukotta · First Unread Post

as of vs on

Why does the sentence below use "as of", instead of using "on"? However, the administration did come close to its goal of vaccinating 160 million adults by the holiday -- 157 million adults were fully vaccinated as of Saturday, federal data shows . https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/04/health/us-coronavirus-sunday/index.htmlRead More...
No. Another meaning of "as of" is "starting from," which is the one that applies above. "As of" above is not a compound preposition. In (2), "as" forms part of "as well as," and the noun "masters" has been omitted: - But Oswio and his son Ecgfrith greatly extended their territories towards the north and north-west, making themselves masters of the kingdoms of Strathclyde and Dalriada, as well as masters of a large part of the Pictish kingdom. As you can see, "as" is not in any way related to...Read More...
Last Reply By Gustavo, Co-Moderator · First Unread Post

excited / exciting

Books , magazines , films , etc. with no artistic value that describe or show sexual acts or naked people in a way that is intended to be sexually exciting : In the above sentence why did ' exciting " use instead of excited ?Read More...
Thank you so much Sir, God bless youRead More...
Last Reply By Former Member · First Unread Post

preposition ‘of’ by itself can take the objective clause?

Hello, everyone, Paralysis by analysis is a state of overthinking and analyzing a particular problem, but you still end up not making a decision . One famous ancient fable of the fox and the cat explains this situation of paralysis by analysis in the simplest way. In the story, the fox and the cat discuss how many ways they have to escape their hunters. Cat quickly climbs a tree. Fox, on the other hand, begins to analyze all the ways to escape that he knows. But unable to decide which one...Read More...
Hi, Gustavo, I really like your elaborate explanation. Hi, David, you're always enlightening me by providing a new approaching way.Read More...
Last Reply By deepcosmos · First Unread Post

could OR can

Teacher : Good Morning, class! Please take your seats! Stop talking and be quiet. So that, we could start the lesson! Why didn't Teacher use "CAN" instead of "COULD" in the above sentence? Thanks in advance!Read More...
Hi, Grammar Man—Where does this example come from? "So that, we could start the lesson!" is not only incorrect; it is not a sentence. Here is a better way of phrasing things, which is also grammatical, and it uses "can," not "could": Good morning, class! Please take your seats, stop talking, and be quiet, so that we can start the lesson.Read More...
Last Reply By David, Moderator · First Unread Post

a reference question

Hello, Another space application that began under government sponsorship but quickly moved into the private sector is the relay of voice, video, and data via orbiting satellites. Satellite telecommunications has developed into a multibillion-dollar business and is the one clearly successful area of commercial space activity. A related, but economically much smaller, commercial space business is the provision of launches for private and government satellites. In 2004 a privately financed...Read More...
I can see that in several of the examples "successful" refers to the launch or landing of the spacecraft. I will not say that the other examples are wrong. What I do say is that "its," just like "it," refers to the sending of the spacecraft, not to the spacecraft itself: Although it was technically a much less challenging achievement than carrying humans into orbit, its success was seen as an important step toward opening up space to commercial travel and eventually to tourism. It would be...Read More...
Last Reply By Gustavo, Co-Moderator · First Unread Post

Where & when

I noticed that these words ( situation , stage, point, even time) sometimes are followed by where or when. My question is: I there a rule for using where or when after the above mentioned words?Read More...
Interesting question, Ahmed. I don't think there's a rule that establishes when it is better to use when or where after temporal nouns like situation, stage, point. I remember writing about this in another post some time ago, but cannot find it. In my experience, "where" tends to sound more natural than "when" after those nouns, and is therefore more usual. "When" will always be used when the preceding noun is strictly temporal, like year, month, date , but "where" will usually be more...Read More...
Last Reply By Gustavo, Co-Moderator · First Unread Post

book or books

Dear Sir (1) Please open your book to page 20 (2) Please open your books to page 20 Which one is right and why? Thanks in advance!Read More...

How to paraphrase "seem to intimidate"

- Kim seemed to intimidate the PM. Source: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Question: does the sentence mean 1 or 2: 1. It seemed Kim would intimidate the PM. 2. It seemed Kim intimidated the PM habitually. But if a=b, and (b) describes a state of "now", or, the state of being intimidated is simultaneous with "seeming", paraphrase (1) doesn't work with the future marker "would". So only (2) is possible. Am I correct? I exclude the possibility of referring to a previous or...Read More...
No, Robby, that sentence is fine. You should delete the question mark. If you check on Google Books and on various corpora, you will see how common and normal it is to use to use the simple present of "intimidate" to refer to a state.Read More...
Last Reply By David, Moderator · First Unread Post

Had - auxiliary verb and main verb

(1) I had a great time. (2) By the time we arrived, the meeting had finished. The HAD used in the above sentence, which sentence auxiliary verb and which is main verb? Can you give me couple of sentences in detail? Another doubt is that when we use these two 'had', do we need two past actions? When HAD becomes Auxiliary Verb and Main Verb?Read More...
I'm not sure why you are under the impression that a sentence like "I had a great time" may be incorrect without an addition, Grammar Man. It's fine. You example (2) is ungrammatical because you have used an objective-case pronoun as the subject of the "till"-clause. "Her" should be "she." The sentence "I had a great time till she came home" is also correct, but the sentence implies that you ceased having a good time when she came home.Read More...
Last Reply By David, Moderator · First Unread Post

Had / Did

With HAD, we talk about past things and with DID we talk about past things. So what are the difference between them? Ex. I had completed my home work yesterday I did complet my homework yesterday. Difference?Read More...
Thank you so much for your time and effort, Sir. It is rare to see people like you in this world helping uneducated people like me. God bless you for that.Read More...
Last Reply By Former Member · First Unread Post
×
×
×
×