All Topics

Hi, Mika. Both sentences are grammatically correct, but different in meaning. With "in" at the end of the sentence, the emphasis is on the house, meaning the house is such as is so noisy that I cannot fall asleep if I sleep in it, while without "in", the emphasis is on my impression that I cannot fall asleep because the house is too noisy.Read More...

Hi, Nada, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange, The comparative adjective of the compound adjective 'well-known' could be either 'better-known' or 'more well-known', so c) a & b is the correct answer.Read More...

Really appreciate your response. Could you add some more explanation to what I've understood below when it is convenient (based on the comma added); (1) The author intentionally uses 'present perfect' to compare the bachelors case in the past with the one in the present. If he/she has no intention to compare, they can use 'simple past'. (2) You're right and simple past is enough in that case. (3) We can use 'past perfect' here only when we have a special context which shows an event occurred...Read More...

Hi, Andrew—In both instances, "it's" is a contraction of "it is," and "it" may be classified as situational, referring, as is contextually obvious, to "the point" or "the thing of importance in the point that has just been made."Read More...

Hi, Andrew—"Usually" and "unfortunately" are different types of adverb(ial), and this has implications regarding whether they should be set off from the rest of the sentence with one or more commas. "Usually" is centrally related to the situation. It is a frequency adverbial, like "every Friday." Notice that there wouldn't be a comma before it at the end or middle of the sentence, though there could be in sentence-final position. Usually they went to the store. They usually went to the...Read More...

Hi, Andrew—Your sentence means that the defenders and the engineers are in a state of agreement. It is not about acts of agreeing. If you changed "happily agree" to "will happily agree" or "are happy to agree," the meaning would be that acts of agreement between them are latent potentialities.Read More...

Hi, Andrew—I don't see anything special about the "in the way that" in your example. "Way" is modified by a relative clause. It is about the way in which X was done and presupposes that X could have been done in more than one way.Read More...

Thank you for explaining it so clearly, David.Read More...

Hi, Tony. The two words are not synonyms. To predict is usually to foretell with precision of calculation, knowledge, or shrewd inference from facts or experience: The astronomers can predict an eclipse. (From Collins Dictionary.) However, If something foreshadows an event or situation, it suggests that it will happen. e. g . W hat are the signs that foreshadow a suicide. (From Collins Dictionary.)Read More...

Hi, Tony C. Turnaround or turnround is an established dictionary entry, therefore, fast turnaround time is the right expression. Moreover, "turnaround" without "time" means turnaround time. The word "time" is optional, unless you'd like to put emphasis on it. (The turnaround or turnaround time of a task is the amount of time that it takes. From Collins Dictionary)Read More...

Hi, Medo, and welcome to the Grammar Exchange, When we talk about frequently repeated actions, ' when ' sounds more natural to use (like your example above). However, when two things happen at the same time or when one thing happens immediately after the other, we use on/upon doing sth ( NOT when )". From 'Longman Dictionary Of Common Errors', page 356: - When hearing that the child had been found, she burst into tears. × × × - On hearing that the child had been found, she burst into tears. √√√Read More...

Hi, Andrew, I think there are are two sides to this question—a grammatical and a semantic one. From a grammatical perspective, my view is that, whenever available, nouns are better than gerunds when it comes to taking an of -complement. Since we do have the noun "transfer," I find "the transfer of one's vote" more natural than "the transferring of one's vote." If there is no noun, then the gerund can naturally take an of -complement, for example: the casting of one's vote . Semantically...Read More...

Yes, both are correct depending on the context, but different in meaning. a) is correct, meaning the car outside the house is mine. b) is correct only on condition that the listener knows the car you are talking about. The car (that, you know, we have talked about) is mine and is outside the house.Read More...

It is often the case that there are different ways of saying the same thing in English. It all depends on the context to decide which one is most appropriate. As to your question, if the speaker was 100 % sure that she arrived at the station too late, and then "must have missed" should be used," because it is logically necessary. If the speaker was not 100 % sure and only speculated, then "should have missed" is also appropriate.Read More...

Hi, Andrew—One alternative to using quotation marks to mark a neologism as a neologism, at least on the first mention, is to put a hyphen before the suffix: cartoon-ize, cartoon-ization . Also, you might consider the -ify and -ification suffixes as alternatives in forming your neologism: cartoon-ify, cartoon-ification . I couldn't say whether I prefer cartoonize to cartoonify , or cartoonization to cartoonification .Read More...

Thank you so much Gustavo, Co-Moderator and ahmed_btm As we can see, there are 4 ways of talking about the future. Sometimes I don't know to choose the form to use and the differences between them. Here are some of my opinions, please help me check if it is correct or not: (1) I am visiting Pairs next month. => If I already have fixed arrangements ( already booked tickets, hotels...). I have a question here: if the listener hears this sentence, do they think that the speaker already has...Read More...

Thanks! That makes sense!Read More...

I managed to work around it, actually! I managed to change the quote so that I could use my own words and use a hyphen. Thanks for your help on this; I really appreciate it. The issue still remains as to where the boundary is between error and bad style; maybe there are no clear rules that allow one to form such a boundary.Read More...

I think that you're probably correct that he meant it as a sequence just like you said. But if there's any room for doubt then it's important to approach this accordingly and not restrict the meaning. But we don't want ambiguity either.Read More...

Hi, Tony, I'd say: - I need to place an order for my name cards in a quantity of 500. - I need to place an order for (a quantity of) 500 of my name cards.Read More...

Hi, Tony, The word "prospective" entails a sense of expectation or probability which the term "future" lacks. It seems to me that "prospective clients" is less certain than "future clients."Read More...